JD Checker
Paste a job description. Get a score, suggested fixes and rewrites, the law or research behind each check, and a one-page HR & Legal summary. Nothing you paste leaves your browser.
Your job description
Your JD check
JD check ·
All checks
HR & Legal summary · Job ad review
| Check | Result | Basis |
|---|
To fix before posting
Also worth a look (clarity and reach)
Citations
Educational, not legal advice. Laws vary by state and city; check with your employment counsel. Checked privately in the browser at leaderswhohire.com/jd-checker.
What to fix
Improved copy
We swapped what we safely could and added lines to fill in. Anything in [brackets] is yours to complete.
A rule-of-thumb score, not a prediction. Pay range, location, must-haves, protected-trait wording, title vs. level and structure count most. Educational, not legal advice. Laws vary by state and city; check with your employment counsel.
Clear JD, still no candidates?
How we check
Each check says what it rests on: The law (a statute, regulation or agency guidance), Research (a published study), or Our rule of thumb. Educational, not legal advice. Laws vary by state and city; check with your employment counsel.
Pay range
- The law
- A growing list of states require a pay range in postings. As of October 2026 they include California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Vermont and Washington, plus Washington, D.C. Some cities add their own rules; thresholds differ. Source
- Research
- About half of U.S. postings on Indeed show pay (51.8% in August 2026). Source
Age-neutral wording
- The law
- Federal rules say help-wanted ads “may not contain terms and phrases that limit or deter the employment of older individuals,” naming “young,” “college student” and “recent college graduate” as examples (29 CFR § 1625.4(a)). Source
- Our rule of thumb
- We also flag “digital native.” It isn’t one of the rule’s examples, but it can read as a preference for younger people, so we suggest “comfortable with digital tools.” And we flag caps like “no more than 5 years of experience” and suggest a minimum instead.
Sex-neutral titles and pronouns
- The law
- Title VII bars job notices “indicating any preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination” based on sex and other protected traits, with a narrow exception for bona fide occupational qualifications (42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(b)). We flag titles like “salesman” and suggest neutral ones. Source
Language and origin
- The law
- EEOC guidance: an English fluency requirement “is permissible only if required for the effective performance of the position,” and an accent matters only if it “interferes materially with job performance” (2016). Source
- Our rule of thumb
- “Native speaker” describes where someone learned a language, not how well they use it. We suggest naming the level the work needs, such as “fluent in English” or “professional working proficiency in Spanish.”
Work authorization
- The law
- The INA bars citizenship-status discrimination, with exceptions for employers with three or fewer employees and for requirements imposed by law, regulation, executive order or government contract (8 U.S.C. § 1324b). The Justice Department lists “Only U.S. Citizens” and “H-1Bs or OPT Candidates Preferred” as risky posting language. “No visa sponsorship” isn’t flagged. Source
- Our rule of thumb
- We skip this flag when the ad mentions a security clearance, export controls or a government contract.
Disability-aware requirements
- The law
- Under the ADA, a qualified person can do the essential functions “with or without reasonable accommodation,” and a written description prepared before advertising is evidence of those functions (42 U.S.C. § 12111(8)). Criteria that screen out people with disabilities must be job-related and consistent with business necessity (§ 12112(b)(6)). Source
- Our rule of thumb
- We suggest “with or without reasonable accommodation” on physical requirements, and question a driver’s license when nothing else mentions driving. The ADA doesn’t require that exact phrase.
Criminal history
- The law
- California bars ads saying people with criminal history won’t be considered, such as “No Felons” (2 CCR § 11017.1(a)(2)); New York City also bars “background check required” in ads (47 RCNY § 2-04). EEOC guidance (2012) cautions against blanket exclusions. Other states and cities have fair-chance rules; roles where a law requires a check have exceptions. Source
- Our rule of thumb
- Blanket exclusions are a Fix; a plain mention of a background check is a Tip.
Salary history
- The law
- Many states and cities limit asking about pay history, for example California Labor Code § 432.3 and New York Labor Law § 194-a. Asking about pay expectations is the usual alternative. Source
EEO and accommodation line
- The law
- Covered federal contractors must say in job ads that qualified applicants are considered without regard to disability and protected veteran status (41 CFR §§ 60-741.5, 60-300.5). The separate requirement under Executive Order 11246 ended with that order’s revocation in January 2025; its regulations are rescinded effective October 26, 2026. Source
- Our rule of thumb
- For other employers it’s good practice, so missing it is a Tip.
Automated hiring tools
- The law
- If the ad mentions AI or automated screening: NYC Local Law 144 requires a bias audit and notice to NYC candidates at least 10 business days before use, and Illinois requires notice when AI is used in employment decisions (effective January 1, 2026). This is a tip with no points. Source
Must-haves
- Research
- In a survey reported in Harvard Business Review (Mohr, 2014), the most common reason for not applying was “I didn’t think they would hire me since I didn’t meet the qualifications, and I didn’t want to waste my time and energy” (the top reason for 41% of women and 46% of men). Respondents “thought that the required qualifications were…well, required qualifications.” Source
- Our rule of thumb
- More than 8 must-haves gets flagged.
Degree flexibility
- The law
- Under Title VII, a requirement with a disparate impact must be job related and consistent with business necessity; Griggs v. Duke Power (1971) involved a diploma requirement. Source
- Our rule of thumb
- We suggest “or equivalent experience” on degree lines.
Gendered wording
- Research
- Gaucher, Friesen & Kay (2011) found women rated ads with more masculine-coded words as less appealing and anticipated less belonging. Source
- Research
- A larger 2023 study of real postings and a field experiment found little measurable effect on who applied (Castilla & Rho). Source
- Our rule of thumb
- So we treat balance as a small, easy way to widen appeal, not a fix on its own. We flag when masculine-coded words lead by 3 or more and by half again.
Clarity and reach
- Research
- LinkedIn found posts of 1–300 words drew 8.4% more applications per view than average; Flesch-Kincaid grade level for readability. Source
- Our rule of thumb
- Over 700 words, reading grade above 14, a title that doesn’t match the level, clichés like “rockstar,” missing sections, and “the ideal candidate” instead of “you” each get a tip.
Sources
- 29 CFR § 1625.4, ADEA rule on help-wanted notices and advertisements
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(b), Title VII: job notices indicating a preference
- U.S. EEOC, Enforcement Guidance on National Origin Discrimination (2016): fluency and accent
- 42 U.S.C. § 12111(8) and § 12112(b)(6), Americans with Disabilities Act: essential functions and job-related criteria
- 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, Immigration and Nationality Act: citizenship-status discrimination and its exceptions
- U.S. Department of Justice, Immigrant and Employee Rights Section: Citizenship Status Discrimination fact sheet (rev. April 2024)
- California Fair Chance Act regulation, Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2, § 11017.1(a)(2); see also NYC 47 RCNY § 2-04(a)(1)
- U.S. EEOC, Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records (2012)
- California Labor Code § 432.3 (salary history; pay scale in postings); see also N.Y. Labor Law § 194-a
- Example pay-range posting law: D.C. Code § 32-1453.01 (see also N.Y. Labor Law § 194-b)
- 41 CFR § 60-741.5 (Section 503) and § 60-300.5 (VEVRAA): federal contractor job-ad statements
- Federal Register 2026-17114: Rescission of Executive Order 11246 implementing regulations (effective Oct 26, 2026)
- NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection: Automated Employment Decision Tools (Local Law 144)
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971)
- Tara Sophia Mohr, Harvard Business Review (2014): why people don’t apply
- Gaucher, Friesen & Kay, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2011): gendered wording in job ads
- Castilla & Rho, Management Science (2023): The Gendering of Job Postings in the Online Recruitment Process
- Indeed Hiring Lab, Pay Transparency Tracker: 51.8% of U.S. job postings on Indeed showed pay in August 2026
- LinkedIn Talent Blog: analysis of about 4.5 million job posts, 2016–2017
- Kincaid et al. (1975), the Flesch-Kincaid grade-level formula; Federal Plain Language Guidelines
Job ad standards you can adopt
A one-page checklist to share with hiring managers. Adapt it to your organization and your counsel’s advice.
- Pay. Every posting shows a good-faith pay range.
- Where and how. City and state, plus on-site, hybrid or remote, near the top.
- The work first. 3–5 bullets on what the person will actually do.
- Few true must-haves. About 5 to 8; everything else goes under “Nice to have.”
- Skills over proxies. Degrees say “or equivalent experience” unless the degree is truly required. Experience is a minimum, never a maximum.
- Neutral wording. No terms tied to age, sex, national origin or disability. Neutral job titles; write to “you.”
- Language needs, stated as skills. “Fluent English” or “conversational Spanish,” only where the job needs it.
- Physical tasks, stated as tasks. What and how often, “with or without reasonable accommodation.” A driver’s license only if driving is part of the job.
- Work authorization, not citizenship. Ask about authorization and sponsorship; citizenship only where a law or contract requires it.
- No criminal-history or pay-history screens in the ad. Handle required checks at the offer stage, and ask for pay expectations instead of pay history.
- An EEO and accommodation line. Required wording for covered federal contractors; good practice for everyone.
- Plain language. Short sentences, under about 700 words, reviewed by HR before posting.
Adopted by: ______________________________ Date: ______________
From LeadersWhoHire’s free JD Checker (leaderswhohire.com/jd-checker). Educational, not legal advice. Laws vary by state and city; check with your employment counsel.
Common questions
How do I know if my job description is any good?
Check the basics first: a pay range, the location and work mode, what the person will actually do, and a short list of true must-haves. Then check the wording: keep it neutral on age, sex, national origin and disability, and keep requirements tied to the job. This checker does all of that in a few seconds and shows you what to change.
Do I have to include a pay range in a job posting?
It depends on where you hire. As of October 2026, states with pay-range posting laws include California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Vermont and Washington, plus Washington, D.C., and some cities. Thresholds and details differ. This is educational, not legal advice; check with your employment counsel.
What words should I avoid in a job description?
Federal rules bar job ads that show a preference based on a protected trait. Examples include “recent college graduate” (age) and “salesman” (sex). We also flag “digital native,” which can read as a preference for younger people (“comfortable with digital tools” says what you need), and “native English speaker.” “Native speaker” describes where someone learned a language, not how well they use it, so name the level the work needs, such as “fluent in English.” Clichés like “rockstar” aren’t illegal, but they say little about the job.
Can a job ad say “U.S. citizens only”?
Usually not. Most employers can ask whether someone is authorized to work in the U.S. and whether they will need visa sponsorship. Citizenship requirements are lawful only in narrow cases, such as when a law, regulation or government contract requires them.
Is this legal advice?
No. It’s an educational check based on federal rules, a few well-known state and city rules, and published research. Laws vary by state and city, so check with your employment counsel before you post.